Detecting Competency... Before You Hire!
Think of a recent colleague who was unsuccessful in his or her
job. What comes to mind? Lack of necessary skills to perform the
duties; inability to get along with the boss or other colleagues, lack
of motivation? How can you tell? More importantly how can
you avoid making a costly hiring mistake?
Focus on the "Right Stuff" -- Competencies
When looking for the best performers, our focus has changed over
the years. Recruitment and selection professionals spent most of the
last 50 years focusing on the task ("what" gets done on the
job). We've learned that this is not enough. To know who will be
successful over the long haul, we also need to focus on the person
("how" they get the job done). Both of these areas can be measured
using clearly defined competencies.
The definition of a competency might differ depending on whom you
ask. Most professionals agree that they are the knowledge, skills,
abilities, or other attributes (KSAOs) that distinguish a person who
is successful in a job or organization from individuals who are
average or unsuccessful performers. Task oriented
competencies are typically specific to functional areas of an
organization or an individual job. They tend to be technical in
nature; for example, having accounting knowledge and expertise. We
often refer to these as technical or functional
competencies. Person oriented competencies
(behavioral or trait-based) are quite broad; for example, having the
ability to build relationships. Behavioral competencies
transfer across jobs, functions and organizations. See the table below
for examples of Technical and Behavioral Competencies.
Task Oriented
Technical Competencies
|
- Computer graphics programs
- Accounting expertise
- IT skills
- Knowledge of industry trends
|
More specific and narrowly defined. Closely tied to specific tasks within a job or function.
|
Person Oriented
Behavioral Competencies
|
- Problem solving
- Decision making
- Building relationships
- Team orientation
- Results-driven
|
Broad based traits transferable across jobs, functions and organizations.
|
Invest in a Competency Modeling Study
At its most basic level, competency modeling may be considered the
systematic process of determining the competencies needed to be
successful in a job or an organization. Survey research going back
nearly a decade reported that between 75% and 80% of companies have
used competency modeling for some sort of human resource
initiative. Over the past decade, the practice of competency modeling
has grown even more prevalent. Competency modeling can be used for a
number of human resources initiatives, including training and
development, selection, and performance appraisal. One would be
hard-pressed to find a company, large or small, that has not at least
tried to implement competency modeling into their organization in some
manner.
A strong competency modeling process will follow professional
procedures and legal guidelines resulting in a valid and legally
defensible foundation for future HR decisions. To accomplish this,
competency definitions should include content that representatively
samples the KSAOs needed to be successful in the position or group of
positions to which the competency model is linked. Likewise, the
process should strongly emphasize the role of Subject Matter Experts
(SMEs) in collecting the information that will define the
competencies. Pre-established qualitative and quantitative and
procedures, such as, SME interviewing methods, data collection
questionnaires, rating scales and data analyses will typically be
employed.
Leverage Your Competency Model for Sound Hiring Decisions
Now that you know which behavioral and technical competencies are
most important to successful performance in a job, you can incorporate
that information into your selection process. For example, using
structured interview questions tied to these competencies can help you
identify strengths and weaknesses in specific areas. When assessing
team orientation, you might ask someone to describe a
time when they worked on a team project that didn't meet all of its
objectives. Then listen to how the person describes the problems he or
she encountered, their personal attempts to solve them, willingness to
take responsibility for lack of success, and so on. This can give you
valuable clues about how this person will deal with similar situations
in the future and fit into an organizational culture that values
collaboration and working on teams.