On October 7, 2005, The Office of Federal Contract Compliance
Programs (OFCCP) issued its final ruling on the definition of an
Internet applicant. The definition will go into effect February 6,
2006, thereby giving organizations a bit of time to work out details
as to how they will meet the standards in their electronic recruitment
programs.
The purpose of this article is to briefly describe the final
definition, and explain a few of the important implications of this
ruling. Because there are many implications, beyond the scope of this
article, I recommend that employers covered by the OFCCP spend the
necessary time to learn all that they can about this ruling. See
http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/fedreg/final/2005020176.htm.
Who Is an Internet Applicant?
In its final ruling, the OFCCP carefully considered public comments
on the proposed definition, making a few changes in the final
version. The final definition states that an Internet applicant is an
individual who meets the following criteria:
- The individual submits an expression of interest in employment
through the Internet or related electronic means.
- The company considers the individual for employment in a
particular position.
- The individual's expression of interest indicates that he or she
meets the basic qualifications for the position.
- The individual at no point in the recruitment process (prior to
receiving an offer of employment) indicates that he or she is no
longer is interested in the position.
In terms of the "basic qualifications for the position," as
indicated in the third criterion, a basic qualification must meet the
following conditions:
- It must be a non-comparative feature of the job seeker. (For
example, if the job candidate has three years of work experience, a
comparative feature might be that the job candidate has among the
highest number of years of work experience.)
- It must be objective. (The job candidate has "a degree in
accounting" would be objective, for example, while the job candidate
has "a good degree" would be subjective.)
- It must be relevant to performance and enable the company to
accomplish business-related goals.
Implications for Organizations
- There is a distinction between which applicants the
organization must keep records on, and which applicants are used to
calculate disparate impact statistics. At the risk of
oversimplifying, contractors must keep rather extensive records on
candidates who expressed an interest in the position, regardless of
whether they met the basic qualifications or not. However, only
candidates who meet the criteria to be considered "applicants" are
used in calculating disparate impact statistics.
- Tests will not be considered basic qualifications. If you are
hoping that your employment tests will be considered "basic
qualifications" and thus can be used as a way to limit the number of
candidates that the OFCCP will consider to be applicants, forget about
it. The final ruling specifically states that tests will not be
considered to be basic qualifications. As a result, you will not be
able to use the test as a basic qualification to help you determine
who is considered an applicant and who is not considered an
applicant.
- Careful training of recruiters and managers will be
imperative. The final ruling puts a great deal of emphasis on a
variety of records that need to be retained, as well as on
establishing standard procedures and consistent decision-making. In
order to follow standardized practices, organizations will need to
ensure that recruiters and hiring managers are properly trained and
understand the company's policies regarding recruitment.
- Basic qualifications must be established in accordance with OFCCP
requirements. I believe that there will be considerable discussion
within organizations as to what the basic qualifications mean and how
to create basic qualifications that meet OFCCP's
definitions. Recruiters and managers will need training to understand
what is acceptable here and what is not acceptable.
Conclusion
For organizations covered by the OFCCP, now is the time to make
sure that you are in compliance with this new ruling and to properly
prepare all recruiters and hiring managers. Don't wait until it is too
late!
This article is for informational purposes only
and should not be construed as legal advice.
Michael M. Harris, Ph.D., EASI·Consult.