An EEOC Update on Inappropriate Interview Questions Under the Americans with Disabilities Act
In the last month or two, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC) has issued additional explanatory documents concerning two
aspects of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The first of
these documents, entitled Questions and Answers about the Association
Provision of the Americans with Disabilities Act, addresses
protections given to applicants and employees regarding people they
associate with who have a disability. The second document, entitled
Questions and Answers about Blindness and Vision Impairments in the
Workplace and the Americans with Disabilities Act, explains various
issues concerning applicants and employees with visual
impairments. What are some of the implications of these documents for
managers responsible for interviewing and hiring job candidates?
An often overlooked part of the ADA protects applicants and
employees from discrimination based on their association with people
who have a disability. An applicant who has a spouse or child, for
instance, with a disability cannot be refused employment on that
basis. However, the person with whom the applicant or employee
associates does not have to be a family member. For example, if an
applicant does volunteer work with an organization that helps
individuals who have AIDS, an employer cannot refuse to hire the
applicant because of those activities.
Because an employer will be considered to be acting in a
discriminatory way if an applicant is turned down for a job due to an
association with others who have a disability, it is important that
interviewers be informed of problematic interview questions.
Interviewers must be very cautious in asking such questions as:
- "Tell me about your family." Aside from other problems with this
kind of question (e.g., it may reveal the number of children an
applicant has or whether the applicant is married), it may get the
interviewer into problematic areas, such as a spouse or child with a
disability, which could lead to ADA problems, as noted above.
- "Describe the kind of interactions you had with people from this
organization." Any kind of question about volunteer work that the
applicant performed must be dealt with cautiously, so that you avoid
leaving the impression that an association with people with
disabilities was the reason for an adverse employment decision.
Unless clearly job-related, it is probably best to avoid probing into
the activities performed by an applicant on a volunteer basis. If you
must delve into this area, be careful to avoid questions that shed a
negative light on those activities.
The second area recently addressed by EEOC concerns visual
impairment. Visual impairments can be somewhat tricky under ADA,
as not all visual impairments will be considered a
disability. Specifically, EEOC notes that a visual impairment is a
disability if: (1) it substantially limits a major life activity; (2)
it was substantially limiting in the past (i.e., if an individual has
a "record of" a substantially limiting impairment); or (3) an employer
"regards" or treats an individual as having a substantially limiting
vision impairment. As with any other disability, EEOC prohibits the
asking of certain questions before making a job offer. Specific
examples provided include: "Have you ever had eye surgery?" "Do you
use any medications for your eye?" and "Do you have any conditions
that may have caused your eye problem?.
The EEOC document does note, however, that an employer may ask all
applicants whether they can meet job-related requirements. Further, an
employer may conduct non-medical tests that require the use of vision
and that measure the applicant's ability to perform job-related
functions. In terms of the latter, the EEOC document specifically
states that an employer who runs a warehouse may ask all applicants if
they can read the labels on products so that they can be stocked in
the appropriate places, or may ask each applicant to demonstrate that
he or she can perform this function.
Finally, the document notes that if a disability is obvious, or if
an applicant discloses that he or she has a visual disability, and the
interviewer believes the applicant will require a reasonable
accommodation to perform the job, the employer may ask whether the
applicant will need a reasonable accommodation and, if so, what type
of accommodation will be needed.
Once a job offer has been made, the ADA allows an employer to
inquire about and even conduct medical examinations for job-related
impairments. It is important to observe, however, that an employer may
not withdraw an offer from a person whose vision impairment is a
disability, unless it can demonstrate that the applicant is unable to
perform the essential functions of the position, with or without a
reasonable accommodation, or that the applicant will pose a direct
threat to safety.
It is becoming increasingly clear that interviewing can no longer
be taken for granted. Even "small talk" initiated by an interviewer
with the goal of relaxing the applicant can lead to inappropriate
questions. In the absence of careful planning and appropriate
guidance, employers increase their risk of discrimination
claims. Interviews should be designed ahead of time, with questions
carefully prepared and reviewed for job relatedness and legal
appropriateness. Interviewers should be trained and refresher
materials should be presented to them on a regular basis. Interview
guidelines should be updated as appropriate and the interviewers
informed of any changes.