|
|
The Seven Deadly Hiring Sins: Part One
Managers succumb to a variety of mistakes in making hiring
decisions. Most of these mistakes can be sorted into seven “deadly
sins”.
- Using unproven selection methods. Some selection methods
are more accurate, or valid, than other methods. Managers may use
unproven selection methods because they fail to understand the
features of valid selection methods. A manager may mistakenly ask
favorite interview questions such as “what’s your favorite color,”
though this bears no job-relatedness whatsoever.
- Poor planning. Some managers fail to plan what kinds of
competencies they are seeking in a job applicant. The bases for hiring
are therefore vague or uncertain. It is not uncommon to find managers
entering an interview situation without having considered ahead of
time what questions they should ask. As a result, they may ask
invalid, inappropriate, or perhaps illegal questions.
- Judgment errors. Decision-makers in any area are prone to a
variety of errors and hiring managers are no exception to this
phenomenon. Halo, in which one characteristic of a job candidate
affects perceptions of other characteristics of the job candidate,
often occurs in the interview. A job candidate who is highly skilled
at verbal communication, for example, is often viewed highly on other
technical skills, even though verbal communication may have nothing to
do with technical skills. Hiring managers sometimes make “snap”
judgments about candidates. That is, they make very fast decisions
about interviewees, without carefully examining all of the relevant
information. Order effects may also occur in hiring. After
interviewing several weak candidates, the first minimally acceptable
candidate may be hired, because by contrast, this applicant appears to
be so much more qualified than the previous ones.
- Hiring in one’s own image. Most people prefer to associate
and work with people who have similar backgrounds (e.g., attended the
same high school or college), hobbies, and interests. Known as the
“similar-to-me” bias, this tendency leads managers to hire people who
think and act the way they do. Unfortunately, this may lead to less
innovation and creative thinking in the organization, particularly at
a time when diversity is needed. Organizations composed of employees
who all think alike are not going to be as effective as organizations
with a diverse group of workers.
- Lack of standardization. Particularly when it comes to the
interview, managers frequently ask different questions of each job
candidate. Not only can this lead to claims of discrimination, but it
can be difficult to compare candidates when they have been asked
different questions. Are some candidates allowed to skip certain steps
in your hiring process? This sometimes happens when a “favored”
candidate is granted special privileges.
- Bureaucratic practices. Some organizations have created too
much “red tape” in their hiring practices. Too many steps must take
place before an individual can be hired; for example, an excessive
number of managers must “sign off” on the hiring
decision. Alternatively, multiple interviews, often involving
repetitive questions, must occur before a decision can be made. As a
result, organizations take too long and risk losing good candidates in
the process.
- Not casting a sufficiently wide net. Without a good set of
recruitment practices, organizations are unable to attract good
candidates for their positions. Some organizations fail to make their
job openings attractive enough, either by not offering competitive pay
and benefit packages or by creating a poor work environment. Other
organizations fail to use the right recruitment sources, whether it is
avoiding the use of Internet recruitment techniques, not posting the
job internally, or not recognizing the importance of employee
referrals. When good candidates fail to apply, it is difficult to hire
quality employees.
Does your organization suffer from any of these seven deadly sins?
It may be time to conduct an audit of your hiring practices to
determine whether any of these problems exist. A future article will
provide some ideas on avoiding these mistakes.
Michael M. Harris,
Ph.D. is Vice President of Litigation Support Services at EASI·Consult.
|
|