Good preparation pays off when it comes to improving the performance and profitability
of your organization. One area where planning can have long-range impact is in the
selection of employees. The most common method companies use to make hiring
decisions is the interview. Obviously, the goal is to find the best people possible for your
organization. Research has provided evidence that when done well, the interview is one
of the best predictors of successful job performance. By investing resources into
improving your interview process, you will make better hiring decisions. One of the best
ways to improve selection interviews is to make them structured interviews. Here are
some reasons why you should add structure to your interviews.
Structured interviews contain questions that are prepared in advance. The development
of questions requires that job related competencies are identified before the interview. As
a result, all of the questions asked of applicants are value added -- they address
characteristics needed to be successful on the job. Standardized interview questions
lessen the chance that an interviewer might be influenced by extraneous information that
is not job related. In addition, the guidelines, scoring rules, and procedures for
conducting the interview are pre-determined. Adding structure to the interview results in
consistency. Each applicant is asked the same questions and as a result, comparative
information is acquired from each applicant. All of the applicants are rated on the same
rating scale, which provides a measurable way to compare each person and assess
agreement among interviewers. Putting structure into your interview makes it much
easier to make comparisons and smart hiring decisions. Since all candidates are asked
similar, job-related questions, structured interviews will improve your selection process,
as well as the legal defensibility of your decisions.
Structured interviews are commonly behavior based.
Instead of asking vague questions such as, "Tell me your three
strengths and three weaknesses", structured interview questions focus
on a candidate's past behavior (i.e., performance). Candidates are
asked to comment on specific situations they've encountered and to
describe how they have dealt with those situations. It is important in
predicting job performance to find out what the applicant typically
does in job related situations. The best way to do this is look for
examples of what they've done in the past. Finding out what someone
has done answers the question of how that person is likely to perform
on the job. Questions such as, "Describe a time when you convinced
other team members to work together. What did you do?" elicit specific
behaviors that give you this kind of critical information. Structured
interviews allow follow up questions to gain further information about
the applicant's response. In addition, the interviewer is encouraged
to take notes about the applicant's behaviors, decreasing the
likelihood that the interviewer will have to rely on memory for
evaluating the applicant.
Are there disadvantages to using structured interviews? Obviously, the structured
interview requires more time and coordination of efforts to develop job related questions.
Some managers are reluctant to standardize their interviewing process. They may feel
they are giving up control of the hiring decision. This is often the result of a
misunderstanding of structured interviews. A well-developed structured interview is a
script that each interviewer must follow. However, skilled interviewers can use this
structure as a springboard to probe for detailed information that confirms or negates their
initial gut feeling about a candidate.
For more information on structured interviews you are encouraged to see the resources
referenced below or review EASI·InterviewsTM at www.easiconsult.com/interviews.
Take the stress out of decision-making; take the time to add structure to your selection
interviews!
References:
Gatewood, R.D., & I, H.S. (2001). Human resource selection, 5th ed. Harcourt: Orlando,
FL.
Van der Zee, K.I., Bakker, A.B., & Bakker, P. (2002). Why are structured interviews so
rarely used in personnel selection? Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 176-184